Medical Coding Mistake Sent Doctor to Jail Due to Lack of Awareness of the Law

About This Blog

In this episode of Fountain of Vitality with LaMont Leavitt, Dr. Evan Gwilliam brings over a decade of medical coding expertise and audit defense experience to expose the costly mistakes that transform well-intentioned healthcare providers into federal fraud targets. As a certified professional coder, certified professional medical auditor, and compliance specialist, Dr. Gwilliam has defended doctors facing license revocation, testified before administrative law judges, and educated thousands of clinicians nationwide on coding compliance. His journey began 12 years ago when he partnered with ChiroCode, to lead the massive ICD-10 transition that reshaped medical coding across the chiropractic profession.

Dr. Gwilliam's consulting work spans attorney collaboration, audit defense, and educational seminars focused on streamlining administrative systems while protecting providers from compliance disasters. His relationship with findacode.com continues as a core resource for accessing complete code descriptions, official guidelines, and supporting documentation during high-stakes audit defense cases. Through his experiences defending providers accused of fraud, navigating recoupment demands, and implementing preventive compliance systems, Dr. Gwilliam reveals that most coding violations stem from ignorance rather than intent, making education the most effective defense against career-destroying audit outcomes.

The Oil Field Worker Case That Led To Jail Time  

Dr. Gwilliam recounts defending a chiropractor who spent days in jail after unknowingly committing insurance fraud while treating oil field workers. The doctor traveled to another state where fracking camps housed workers earning substantial incomes with excellent health insurance coverage. These laborers worked grueling 15-hour days performing physically demanding work, creating a consistent demand for chiropractic services. The doctor matched their work ethic, seeing patients continuously throughout extended days while living in the camp alongside workers.

The billing disaster emerged from the doctor's approach to rehabilitative exercise code 97110, which requires one-on-one patient interaction for 15-minute increments. Instead of individual sessions, the doctor worked with four or five patients simultaneously in group settings, providing exercise instruction and guidance to multiple workers at once. He billed each patient for individual services despite the group format, violating the fundamental one-on-one requirement embedded in the code definition. The insurance company analyzed his billing patterns and calculated that his documented services would require 27 hours per day to complete legitimately.

The attorney general arrested the doctor at his home, and he spent several days in jail facing insurance fraud charges that threatened his license and livelihood. Dr. Gwilliam was brought in to provide expert testimony and audit defense, using findacode.com to access CPT articles, official code definitions, and supporting documentation. He testified before an administrative law judge, presenting evidence that the doctor's primary mistake was ignorance rather than intentional fraud. The doctor ultimately kept his license after a probationary period, paid back hundreds of thousands of dollars in recoupment demands, and received the education necessary to prevent future violations.

The Red Convertible Speed Limit Metaphor For Compliance  

Dr. Gwilliam uses a memorable metaphor to explain audit risk and compliance boundaries. He compares coding compliance to buying a red convertible during a midlife crisis and driving through a school zone with flashing yellow lights indicating a 20 mph speed limit. Providers must understand the speed limit exists, know the specific number, and recognize that driving a visually distinctive vehicle increases scrutiny. Going 35 mph in a 20 mph zone guarantees getting pulled over, while staying at or near 20 mph keeps providers safe from enforcement action.

The oil field doctor was driving 50 mph in metaphorical terms. His billing patterns were so far outside normal parameters that detection became inevitable once insurance companies analyzed his claim submissions. Providers who understand coding rules can make informed decisions about acceptable risk levels. Going 22 or 23 mph might be acceptable, while 25 mph represents a conscious choice to accept slightly elevated risk. The key involves understanding where boundaries exist and making deliberate decisions rather than operating in ignorance.

Outliers attract attention regardless of intent. Providers billing significantly more or differently than peers create audit targets through statistical analysis of claim patterns. Insurance companies identify these outliers through data mining and trigger investigations when billing deviates substantially from expected norms. Dr. Gwilliam emphasizes that knowing the rules allows providers to assess their risk exposure accurately. Those who choose to operate near boundaries must understand exactly what rules they're approaching and what documentation supports their billing decisions.

Preventive Audit Systems That Transform Documentation Quality  

Dr. Gwilliam wishes more clients engaged his services proactively rather than reactively after receiving demand letters. Most providers don't recognize they need audit defense until insurers notify them of compliance issues and demand substantial repayment. A typical scenario involves receiving notification that the insurance company reviewed records, identified problems, and wants $250,000 back from payments made over previous years. Few clinics can absorb quarter-million-dollar hits from funds already received and spent on operations.

His preventive system involves creating comprehensive report cards based on the most common codes used by specific provider types. He builds criteria using findacode.com resources that establish clear documentation requirements for each frequently billed code. Providers submit sample records, and Dr. Gwilliam applies the coding rules to evaluate compliance levels. Initial audits often result in C-plus grades, with detailed explanations of missing elements and specific corrective actions needed to achieve higher scores.

Providers implement the recommended changes and submit additional records for follow-up evaluation. Subsequent audits typically show improvement from C-plus to B-plus as providers incorporate better documentation practices. Dr. Gwilliam maintains high standards, rarely awarding A grades but acknowledging A-minus performance when providers demonstrate mastery of coding requirements. This iterative improvement process prepares providers for inevitable external audits by ensuring their documentation withstands scrutiny when insurance companies or regulatory agencies conduct reviews.

FindACode As Essential Audit Defense Tool  

Dr. Gwilliam relies heavily on findacode.com during audit defense preparation, testimony, and educational content creation. The platform provides immediate access to complete code descriptions, CPT articles, official guidelines, and supporting references without requiring extensive physical book collections or time-consuming manual research. During the oil field worker case, he used findacode.com to locate specific code requirements, guideline interpretations, and authoritative sources that supported his testimony before the administrative law judge.

The search functionality allows rapid location of relevant codes and associated documentation requirements. Rather than maintaining extensive shelf space for multiple coding manuals and reference materials, Dr. Gwilliam accesses current information digitally from any location. This efficiency reduces client costs by minimizing research time while ensuring accuracy through access to the most current coding information available. Outdated references create liability, making current digital resources essential for credible audit defense.

Yesterday's work provides a recent example of findacode.com's utility. Dr. Gwilliam was building educational content about evaluation and management codes and their bundling relationships with other services. He needed to demonstrate that relative value units for one code exceeded another code, supporting his argument that bundling rules created unfair payment scenarios. He used the pie metaphor, explaining that insurers tried to pay $10 for two pies when one pie alone was worth $15. The data supporting this argument came directly from findacode.com, enabling clear communication of complex coding concepts through relatable analogies.

The Future Of Healthcare Documentation Through AI  

Dr. Gwilliam observes that AI won't replace healthcare providers but will transform how successful practitioners operate. Those who learn to leverage AI tools will thrive, while those who resist or fear technology risk being left behind. He positions himself as average in AI expertise, watching developments like most people while recognizing the fundamental principle that AI adoption separates future success from obsolescence. The key involves understanding how AI fits into individual workflows rather than viewing it as a replacement threat.

InnoviScribe represents the type of AI application that enhances provider efficiency and documentation accuracy. Traditional documentation methods involve point-and-click systems that generate cloned records or require providers to reconstruct patient encounters hours after they occur. These delayed documentation approaches introduce errors as providers struggle to remember specific details from earlier in the day. The doctor who questions whether he examined the left or right arm after seeing ten subsequent patients illustrates documentation accuracy problems created by a time lag between encounter and documentation.

Ambient AI listening technology captures conversations in real-time and generates readable, accurate documentation synchronously with patient encounters. This eliminates the translation step where providers must interpret what happened and write it down later. The encounter itself becomes the documentation through AI interpretation and formatting. Dr. Gwilliam views this technology as the future of healthcare records, creating more accurate documentation while saving providers hours of evening charting time that currently extends workdays well beyond patient care hours.

Scope Of Practice Transitions That Create Criminal Liability  

LaMont Leavitt references his father's story about another provider who went to prison due to scope of practice violations when relocating between states. Healthcare regulations vary significantly across state lines, creating traps for providers who assume their home state practices transfer to new locations. The specific violation involved allowing assistants to perform services that were permissible in one state but prohibited in another. These scope of practice differences create criminal liability when providers fail to research and understand regulatory variations.

Dr. Gwilliam encounters these issues regularly, though his current project focuses more on educational content than audit defense. The evaluation and management coding toolkit he's developing for his billing service addresses bundling issues where certain codes should not be billed together. His work involves teaching clients proper code application and helping them understand when procedures can be billed separately versus when they must be bundled into comprehensive service codes.

The challenge of maintaining compliance across multiple jurisdictions affects any provider operating in multiple states or transitioning practice locations. Regulations governing assistant utilization, procedure authorization, and documentation requirements differ substantially between states. Providers must research specific requirements for each jurisdiction where they practice, understanding that legitimacy in one location doesn't guarantee compliance in another. These transitions represent high-risk periods where education and careful review prevent costly violations.

Technology Evolution From Barcodes To AI  

Dr. Gwilliam's career spans dramatic technological evolution in healthcare documentation. Fifteen years ago, he worked as an associate in a busy chiropractic clinic where he received all the work the owner didn't want to do. The clinic closed at 5 PM, sending staff home while Dr. Gwilliam remained until 7 PM most nights completing charting. The documentation system involved a wall poster covered with barcodes, each representing a different documentation phrase. He used a barcode scanner to build patient narratives by scanning multiple phrases that theoretically combined into coherent records.

Half the time, the scanner malfunctioned, and the other half the scanned phrases didn't fit together logically. Reading the resulting documentation revealed disjointed, awkward narratives that failed to communicate clearly. This primitive technology represented state-of-the-art practice management at the time, yet it consumed hours of provider time while producing mediocre documentation quality. The contrast between that era and current AI ambient listening technology illustrates the transformation that occurred in just 15 years.

Current technology allows AI to listen to patient conversations, interpret meaning, and generate formatted documentation that accurately reflects the encounter. This advancement eliminates the translation steps, scanner failures, and evening documentation marathons that characterized practice management a decade ago. Dr. Gwilliam would have sacrificed substantially to go home for dinner with his family instead of staying late to scan barcodes and rewrite documentation. The efficiency gains available through current technology represent opportunities that providers must embrace to remain competitive and avoid burnout.

Consolidation And The Future Of Small Practice Survival  

Dr. Gwilliam predicts healthcare consolidation will accelerate as solo providers join larger groups to access resources unavailable to independent practitioners. Small practices struggle to maintain compliance infrastructure, coding expertise, and technology investments that larger organizations can provide efficiently. The advantages of group participation include access to compliance specialists, audit defense resources, updated technology platforms, and a shared administrative burden that individual providers cannot sustain independently.

Solo practitioners face particular challenges in the current regulatory environment. They lack dedicated staff to manage coding updates, compliance monitoring, and audit preparedness. Many of Dr. Gwilliam's clients are solo providers or small practices struggling with resource constraints that make comprehensive compliance difficult. Joining larger groups provides access to economies of scale that make technology adoption and compliance maintenance feasible without overwhelming individual providers with administrative burdens.

Technology adoption becomes more accessible within group structures that can invest in platforms like AI documentation tools, comprehensive coding resources, and compliance monitoring systems. Independent providers must make these investments alone or risk falling behind competitors who leverage group resources. The consolidation trend reflects economic realities where survival requires either joining larger organizations or maintaining expertise levels that smaller practices find increasingly difficult to sustain independently.

Practical Steps For Audit Protection  

1. Understand Code Requirements - Access complete code descriptions including documentation requirements and time specifications

2. Know Your Speed Limit - Recognize where your billing patterns fall relative to peers and specialty norms

3. Implement Preventive Audits - Conduct internal reviews before external auditors identify problems

4. Document Synchronously - Use technology that captures encounters in real-time rather than reconstructing them later

5. Avoid Cloned Records - Ensure documentation reflects actual patient encounters rather than template repetition

6. Research Scope Changes - Understand regulatory differences when practicing across state lines

7. Maintain Current Resources - Use updated coding references rather than outdated manuals

Taking Action On Compliance Education  

Dr. Evan Gwilliam's audit defense experience offers healthcare providers a roadmap for avoiding the costly mistakes that transform ignorance into fraud accusations. His emphasis on education over punishment, preventive systems over reactive defense, and technology adoption over resistance creates pathways for providers to protect their licenses while maximizing legitimate reimbursement. The red convertible speed limit metaphor provides a memorable framework for understanding audit risk and making informed compliance decisions.

The insights shared on Fountain of Vitality demonstrate that most coding violations stem from a lack of knowledge rather than criminal intent. Providers who invest in compliance education, maintain current coding resources, and implement preventive audit systems position themselves to withstand external scrutiny while avoiding the jail time, license revocation, and massive recoupment demands that destroyed the oil field doctor's practice. The future belongs to providers who embrace technology, understand coding rules, and recognize that staying within the speed limit requires knowing where the boundaries exist.

Visit Fountain of Vitality for more exclusive stories and insights into healthcare compliance, coding education, and practice management strategies that protect providers while optimizing legitimate revenue.

Follow the Fountain of Vitality podcast:

Website: FountainofVitality.com | Tiktok: @FountainofVitalitypod |
YouTube: @FountainofVitalityshow | Facebook: Fountain of Vitality |
Rumble: Fountain_of_Vitality | Instagram: @FountainofVitalitypodcast |
Email: info@FountainofVitality.com | Find A Code: FindaCode.com

Follow LaMont Leavitt:

LinkedIn: @LaMontJLeavitt/ | Twitter/X: @ljleavitt1 |
InnoviHealth Website: innoviHealth.com

Follow Dr. Evan Gwilliam:

LinkedIn: @DrGwilliam | Twitter: @DrGwilliam | Instagram: @drgwilly |
Facebook: Evan.Gwilliam | Profile - PractiSync, Senior VP: Practisync